Study Design

JW Jelmer Westra
ST Shengxian Tu
SW Simon Winther
LN Louise Nissen
MV Mai-Britt Vestergaard
BA Birgitte Krogsgaard Andersen
EH Emil Nielsen Holck
CM Camilla Fox Maule
JJ Jane Kirk Johansen
LA Lene Nyhus Andreasen
JS Jo Krogsgaard Simonsen
YZ Yimin Zhang
SK Steen Dalby Kristensen
MM Michael Maeng
AK Anne Kaltoft
CT Christian Juhl Terkelsen
LK Lars Romer Krusell
LJ Lars Jakobsen
JR Johan H.C. Reiber
JL Jens Flensted Lassen
MB Morten Bøttcher
HB Hans Erik Bøtker
EC Evald Høj Christiansen
NH Niels Ramsing Holm
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

WIFI II was a predefined prospective, observational, investigator-initiated Dan-NICAD substudy with paired assessment of QFR and pressure wire–based FFR. Patients with suspected coronary artery disease and indication for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) evaluation were enrolled at 2 referring centers (Department of Cardiology, Hospitalsenheden Midt, Silkeborg, Denmark; and Department of Cardiology, Hospitalsenheden Vest, Herning, Denmark) between September 11, 2014, and March 31, 2016.14 Patients with stenosis identified by coronary CTA were referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and formed the study population of WIFI II. Lesions with diameter stenosis (DS) of 30% to 90% in vessels with a reference diameter >2.0 mm by visual estimate entered the analyzed population. Angiographic and procedural exclusion criteria were (1) <2 projections with visible stenosis; (2) stenosis in the ostium of the right coronary artery or the left main coronary artery; (3) no administration of intracoronary nitrates; and (4) pressure wire position not documented angiographically. All patients provided informed written consent. The Danish Data Protection Agency and The Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics approved the study. At least 2 authors (J.W. and N.R.H.) had access to all data presented. All authors are responsible for the data integrity. The study material will not be made available to other researchers for competitive reasons.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A