request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

A total of 1 × 107 cells from each cell line was cultured with or without celastrol, and protein extracts were obtained from homogenization with 100 μL of cold lysis buffer containing 50 mMTris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA (ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid), 50 mM NaF, 20 mM KCl, and 250 mM NaCl supplemented with 1 μL of protease inhibitor cocktail. After 1 h at 4 °C, the suspension was frozen and thawed twice in liquid nitrogen. The total extracts were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 30 min, and the supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C until further processing. Protein concentration was measured by Bradford assay, and the samples were concentrated 39× using a 3 kDa ultrafiltration device (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) with 50 mM NH4HCO3. In total, 200 μg of protein was used for tryptic digestion, as previously described [52].

Qualitative and quantitative nano-UPLC tandem nano-ESIHDMSE experiments were conducted with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), as previously reported [52]. Briefly, a 180 μm × 23 mm strong cation exchange (SCX) column (Waters) packed with a 5 μm PolySULFOETHYL Aspartamide (PolyLC, Columbia, MD, USA) was used as the first dimension. Nine salt gradient fractions were used to elute the samples from the SCX column, followed by a reverse-phase (RP) gradient. After all of the peptides had been captured, the trap column was placed online with another RP analytical column (100 µm × 100 mm, 1.8 µm C18, nanoACQUITY UPLC HSS T3, Waters, Milford, MA, USA), and an RP gradient of 5–40% acetonitrile (ACN; containing 0.1% v/v formic acid) in 58 min was used as the second dimension, with a flow rate of 600 nL·min−1.

Analyses were performed using nano-electrospray ionization in positive ion mode, nano-ESI (+), with a NanoLockSpray ionization source (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Multiplexed data-independent (DIA) scanning with added specificity and selectivity of a nonlinear “T-wave” ion mobility (HDMSE; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) experiments was performed with a Synapt HDMS mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) [52]. Full-scan orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (oaTOF) MSE data were acquired from m/z 50 to 2000.

Database searching and protein quantification were performed as previously described [52]. Briefly, Exact Mass Retention Time (ERMT) output tables generated for each condition (with or without celastrol) were filtered by considering a well-defined solitary peak without background noise (OK = 2) and differential expression profile (p = 1 up-regulated and p = 0 for downregulated). Additionally, a fold change higher than 50% (with or without celastrol <0.66 or >1.5) was considered to be indicative of significantly altered levels of expression. After filtering, protein data and associated expression profiles were used as input for the curated pathway database Metacore™ software (GeneGO Inc., Saint Joseph, MI, USA).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A