Neonatal Neuroimaging: CUS and Brain MRI

SH Susan R. Hintz
BV Betty R. Vohr
CB Carla M. Bann
HT H. Gerry Taylor
AD Abhik Das
KG Kathryn E. Gustafson
KY Kimberly Yolton
VW Victoria E. Watson
JL Jean Lowe
MD Maria Elena DeAnda
MB M. Bethany Ball
NF Neil N. Finer
KM Krisa P. Van Meurs
SS Seetha Shankaran
AP Athina Pappas
PB Patrick D. Barnes
DB Dorothy Bulas
JN Jamie E. Newman
DW Deanne E. Wilson-Costello
RH Roy J. Heyne
HH Heidi M. Harmon
MP Myriam Peralta-Carcelen
IA Ira Adams-Chapman
AD Andrea Freeman Duncan
JF Janell Fuller
YV Yvonne E. Vaucher
TC Tarah T. Colaizy
SW Sarah Winter
EM Elisabeth C. McGowan
RG Ricki F. Goldstein
RH Rosemary D. Higgins
ask Ask a question
Favorite

An “early” CUS at 4 to 14 days of age and a “late” CUS at 35 to 42 weeks’ postmenstrual age (PMA) were obtained for NEURO study participants. CUS imaging was obtained per local center clinical protocol and did not specify views. Central reader interpretations were used for all study analyses. Two masked central readers (D.B. and Thomas L. Slovis, MD [see acknowledgments]) reviewed all study CUS independently by using a modified central reading form used in previous NICHD NRN studies.18 A composite adverse finding on early CUS was defined as the presence of grade III or IV intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)19 or cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL) on either or both sides. A composite adverse finding on late CUS was defined as having cPVL or porencephalic cyst, moderate-to-severe ventricular enlargement (VE) on either or both sides, or a shunt. For all CUS, assessment of interobserver reliability between central readers revealed κ = 0.75 for the early CUS composite adverse finding and a κ = 0.88 for the late CUS composite adverse finding. Mastoid views were included in only 48.2% of early CUS and 46.1% of late CUS.15

A conventional brain MRI was obtained at 35 to 42 weeks’ PMA and within 2 weeks of late CUS. Minimum requirements have been previously described,15 and it was advised that neonatal brain MRIs be obtained without the use of sedation. Central reader interpretations were used for study analyses. Copies of MRIs were sent to RTI International by sites in digital or film format. A masked central reader (P.D.B.) reviewed all brain MRIs by using a central reader form that included WMA scoring according to a widely used classification system used to evaluate 5 areas of white matter assessment.6,20 Interrater agreement for moderate or severe WMA by using this classification system has been reported to be >95%.20 Significant cerebellar lesions were defined as lesions that were bilateral, cystic, and/or ≥4 mm in size. Adverse findings on brain MRI were defined as moderate or severe WMA or significant cerebellar lesions.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A