Analysis of microarray data

MK Misaki Kojima
IN Ikuyo Nakajima
AA Aisaku Arakawa
SM Satoshi Mikawa
TM Toshimi Matsumoto
HU Hirohide Uenishi
YN Yuki Nakamura
MT Masaaki Taniguchi
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Raw data were processed using Feature Extraction software Version 9.5 (Agilent Technologies) as previously described [9]. Spot data identified by the software as greater than the background were used for additional analyses. The resulting MIAME compliant microarray data were submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database repository (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE97711.

Gene expression profiles were analyzed with Subio Basic-Plug-in software (Subio Inc., Kagoshima, Japan). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between LWDL and LWDM pigs were defined as a >2.0-fold expression difference with a false discovery ratio (FDR) of < 0.05 by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure [28], as determined using a student’s t-test. Functional annotations of DEGs were investigated with the Gene Ontology Biological Process (GOBP) and with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) v6.7 [29, 30]. Any statistically significant GOBP terms and KEGG pathways (EASE-score, a modified Fisher’s exact P-value < 0.01) we found were selected for further analysis.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A