For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), newly eclosed and 25 day old bee abdomens were fixed using cold 4% PFA buffered in PBS (pH 7.4) overnight. Samples were placed under vacuum to minimize trapped air pockets and then mounted in 5 mm diameter tubing filled with PBS. Three newly eclosed and three 25 day abdomens were imaged using a 16.4T MRI (Ultrashield Plus 700 WB Advance NMR spectrometer, Bruker Optics, Billerica, MA, USA) fitted with a quadrature micro-imaging coil. A gradient echo FLASH sequence was used to obtain high-resolution (15–20 μm isotropic) three-dimensional images of the bee parts suitable for qualitative anatomic characterization and segmentation. A multi-echo RAREVTR sequence was used to acquire spin echo data in two-dimensional slices (in-plane resolution 50 µm) from which R2 relaxation rates were calculated. R2 values were calculated for each voxel using the MRI Analysis Calculator plug-in for ImageJ (v. 1.42) (for detailed acquisition parameters see electronic supplementary material C). The software fits a monoexponential decay function of the form, to the data, where S(0) is the initial amplitude and TE is the echo time. Voxels were excluded where the goodness of fit parameter was less than 0.9.
For X-ray imaging, adult forager abdomens (n = 3) were fixed in cold 4% PFA buffered in PBS (pH 7.4) overnight before dehydrating in a graded series of ethanol to 70% (30, 50, 70%). To increase X-ray absorption in soft tissues, abdomens were heavy metal stained for 24 h using 1% iodine in 70% ethanol (I2E). Samples were rinsed (×3) and imaged in 70% ethanol prior to imaging. Abdomens were scanned at 40 kV and 74 µA using an X-ray micro-computed tomography (X-ray µCT) system (Versa 520, Zeiss, Pleasanton, CA, USA) running Scout and Scan software (v. 10.6.2005.12038, Zeiss). A total of 3201 projections were collected over 360°, each with a 5 s exposure. 2× binning was used to achieve a suitable signal to noise ratio and 0.4× optical magnification was used to achieve an isotropic voxel resolution of 7.9 µm. Raw data were reconstructed using XMReconstructor software (v. 10.7.3679.13921, Zeiss) following a standard centre shift and beam hardening correction of −0.25 and 0, respectively. The standard 0.7 kernel size recon filter setting was also used.
The visualization and analysis of data generated from both MRI and X-ray µCT scans was performed following manual segmentation using Avizo (v. 8.1.1, FEI) software. All measurements were conducted using standard Avizo tools (for workflow see electronic supplementary material D).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.