Statistical analyses were performed on MIC data derived from a 10−2 spot dilution since this dilution achieved significant and reproducible ≤±2-fold MIC differences between pEMR-11 and pMS119EH transformants. The QCC STAC was excluded from analysis since it failed to meet a minimum ±2-fold MIC cutoff. MIC values were used in hierarchical clustering analyses and were scaled according to the equation fold changeQCC = variantQCC/WTQCC, where fold changeQCC is the fold change in the MIC for the QCC, which is the ratio of the mean EmrE variant MIC value (variantQCC) divided by the mean WT EmrE MIC value (WTQCC) for the same QCC (Table S3). Hierarchical agglomerative clustering analysis was performed on the MIC data set using R statistics software (45) and the heatmap.plus package (46). Values listed on each dendrogram show the approximately unbiased (AU) and bootstrap probability (BP) P values obtained after 100 bootstrapped replicates using the R statistics pvclust package and function (47). k-means cluster analysis was used to estimate the significance of various distance and linkage metrics, and from this analysis, a Euclidean distance method using Ward linkage resulted in the most significant number of clusters. Fourfold changes in the MIC value were determined to be the most significant (P ≤ 0.001) when those values were compared to 2-fold changes in the MIC values (P ≤ 0.05) (Fig. S2), on the basis of MIC data obtained for EmrE E14D/E14A (Table S3); hence, the results for 11 QCCs were selected for final assessment (Fig. 1). Venn diagrams of correlated QCC chemicals or properties and EmrE variants were generated using the R statistics VennDiagram package and function (48), using the selection criteria described in the Fig. 3 legend.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.