Data Analysis

SY Sha-Sha Yang
YL Yan-Chun Li
AC Austin A. Coley
LC Linda A. Chamberlin
PY Ping Yu
WG Wen-Jun Gao
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The acquired data were processed using the Clampfit 10 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Neurons with depolarized RMP (> −52 mV) were discarded without further analysis. Instantaneous current (IIns), steady-state current (Iss), and current decay (tau) were calculated from the voltage-clamp recordings. Briefly, the IIns was located at the onset point of the 2-s hyperpolarizing step of each sweep and the Iss was measured at the end of each 2-s hyperpolarizing step. The amplitude of Ih was measured by deducting IIns from Iss at each sweep. Ih time constants were fitted with a standard exponential function of the equation: f(t)=i=1nAiet/τi+C and expressed as the tau value in Clampfit. This is a basic function used to fit changes in current or voltage that are controlled by one or more first-order processes. The fit solves for the amplitude A, the time constant τ, and the constant y-offset C for each component i. The RMP, IR and AHP of pyramidal neurons and PV+ interneurons were measured from the current-clamp recordings. One-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA analyses were performed on parameters by SPSS 23. For results with significant interaction effect in two-way ANOVA, simple effect test was conducted for further analysis. For results with insignificant interaction effect, Bonferroni’s post hoc test or Student t-test was further conducted as needed. All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A