Statistical Analyses

RN Ravinder Nagpal
HT Hirokazu Tsuji
TT Takuya Takahashi
KK Kazunari Kawashima
SN Satoru Nagata
KN Koji Nomoto
YY Yuichiro Yamashiro
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The results of bacterial count (log10 cells per gram of feces) are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The detection rate was expressed as the percentage of infants in which the specific bacterium was detected. During analysis in the spread-sheets to calculate the mean bacterial count and the detection rate, the cells were left blank if the specific bacterium was not detected (i.e., below the detection limit) in a sample. The count of genus Lactobacillus was expressed as the sum of the counts of six subgroups (L. casei subgroup, L. gasseri subgroup, L. plantarum subgroup, L. reuteri subgroup, L. ruminis subgroup, and L. sakei subgroup) and two species (L. brevis and L. fermentum). The comparisons of fecal bacterial counts by the mode of delivery were calculated by unpaired Student’s t-test. Differences in the detection rate of bacteria were calculated by Fisher’s exact probability test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A