Evaluation of AAC

AA Adem Adar
OO Orhan Onalan
HK Hakan Keles
FC Fahri Cakan
UK Ugur Kokturk
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

A standard (posterior-anterior) chest radiograph (40 × 40 cm; Curix HT 1.000G Plus, Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium) was acquired with the patients standing up (Thoramat, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The focus-patient distance was set at 150 cm. An automated exposure control having a fixed tube voltage of 117 kV was used. AAC was graded as follows: grade 0, no visible calcification; grade I, small spots of calcification or thin calcification on the aortic knob; grade II, one or more areas of thickened calcification; and grade III, circular calcification on the aortic knob [11] (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Two examiners, who were blinded to the findings of RRI, reviewed AAC on the chest radiograph. One hundred chest radiographs, randomly selected for the evaluation of AAC, were assessed independently by two cardiologists to assess the reliability of AAC diagnosis. The kappa value was detected to be 0.781 and p to be < 0.001.

Grading of aortic arch calcification.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A