Selection of SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN

VV Virginia Velasco-Tirado
MA Montserrat Alonso-Sardón
AC Adriana Cosano-Quero
ÁR Ángela Romero-Alegría
LA Leire Sánchez-los Arcos
AL Amparo López-Bernus
JP Javier Pardo-Lledías
MB Moncef Belhassen-García
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We used the International Classification of Disease, 9th edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN: SJS, code 695.13;, code 695.14; and TEN, code 695.15). Furthermore, based on a previously validated algorithm, patients who had a length of hospital stay (LOS) shorter than 3 days were excluded to improve the positive predictive value of the diagnostic codes[16].

We included all patients admitted to public hospitals of the NHS between 2010 and 2015 with a primary and/or secondary diagnosis of SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN according to the ICD-9-CM codes, along with a LOS shorter than 3 days. We excluded those patients with LOS for 2 or fewer days. Patients with missing data were also excluded from the study. Firstly, 1,765 patients with diagnosis of SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN were selected during the study period. Of these, 297 patients had a LOS shorter than 3 days, and they were excluded. Finally, 1,468 patients were included in the study.

There is growing evidence that SJS/TEN in the pediatric population has different epidemiology and outcomes than adults, so we stratify the sample in pediatric (<16 years old) vs adult (≥16 years old).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A