SIVAD patients were divided into two groups: asymptomatic (incidental findings) or symptomatic (absence of explanations other than dissection-related). The symptomatic group was divided into nonoperative and endovascular groups (no patients had undergone surgery), based on the treatment received. Patient characteristics, incidence, vascular risk factors, medical histories, follow-up duration, length of hospital stay, change of symptoms, treatment strategies and morphology of the dissection in the CE-CT images and morphological changes were analyzed and compared between groups. Further, we classified the five types based on the CE-CT images (Fig. 1): type I (patent true and false lumen revealing entry and re-entry sites); type II (blind pouch of false lumen); type III (partial thrombosis false lumen); type IV (completely thrombosis false lumen); type V (completely thrombosis lumen).
Drawings illustrate the five types classification based on the abdominal contrast-enhanced computed-tomography for spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection. Type I: patent true and false lumen revealing entry and re-entry sites; type II: blind pouch of false lumen; type III: partial thrombosis false lumen; type IV: completely thrombosis false lumen; type V: completely thrombosis lumen.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.