16S rRNA sequencing and analysis

HS Holly A. Schroeder
KN Kenetta L. Nunn
AS Alison Schaefer
CH Christine E. Henry
FL Felix Lam
MP Michael H. Pauly
KW Kevin J. Whaley
LZ Larry Zeitlin
MH Mike S. Humphrys
JR Jacques Ravel
SL Samuel K. Lai
ask Ask a question
Favorite

DNA extractions for microbiota analysis were performed as previously described22, 23 on aliquots of the same CVM samples used for microscopy studies and other characterizations described. The method of Fadrosh et al.52 was used to analyze the vaginal microbiota composition and structure and relied on amplification and sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (300-bp paired-end reads) of the V3-to-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Sequence analyses and taxonomic assignments were performed using a custom pipeline, freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/cwzkevin/MiSeq16S). The resulting taxonomic assignments are shown in Table S1. To assess whether the vaginal microbiota affected barrier properties and Ab-mediated trapping in CVM, we grouped samples into Community State Types (CSTs) I-V according to the most dominant bacterial species within a sample. Samples were assigned to CSTs according to those identified by Ravel et.al.23: L. crispatus-dominated (CST I), L. gasseri dominated (CST II), L. iners-dominated (CST III), a diverse set of strict or facultative anaerobic bacteria such as G. vaginalis (CST IV), L. jensenii-dominated (CST V). A sample grouped into a particular CST contained an average of ~80% of the class-defining species (Figure S2). However, microbial populations between samples can be extremely diverse. In this sample set, percent of dominant bacterial species used to classify CST ranged from 34.26% to 99.9% of total bacteria.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A