Two-Electrode Voltage Clamp Recording

TK Thomas M. Kaiser
SK Steven A. Kell
HK Hirofumi Kusumoto
GS Gil Shaulsky
SB Subhrajit Bhattacharya
ME Matthew P. Epplin
KS Katie L. Strong
EM Eric J. Miller
BC Bryan D. Cox
DM David S. Menaldino
DL Dennis C. Liotta
ST Stephen F. Traynelis
PB Pieter B. Burger
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Defolliculated Xenopus laevis oocytes (stage V–VI) were obtained from Ecocyte BioScience (Austin, TX) and injected with cRNAs encoding GluN1 and GluN2 at a 1:2 ratio. The cRNA was diluted with RNase-free water to give responses with amplitudes ranging between 200 and 2000 nA (0.2–10 ng total cRNA). Following cRNA injection, the oocytes were stored at 15–19°C in Barth’s solution that contained (in mM) 88 NaCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 1 KCl, 0.33 Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 CaCl2, 0.82 MgSO4, and 5 Tris-HCl (pH 7.4 with NaOH), supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA), and 100 μg/ml gentamicin (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA). Recordings were performed 2–5 days following cRNA microinjection at room temperature (23°C) using a two-electrode voltage-clamp amplifier (OC725; Warner Instrument, Hamilton, CT) to measure current responses to 100 μM glutamate and 30 μM glycine, unless otherwise stated. The signal was low-pass filtered at 10–20 Hz (4-pole, −3 dB Bessel) and digitized at the Nyquist rate using PCI-6025E or USB-6212 BNC data acquisition boards (National Instruments, Austin, TX). Oocytes were placed in a custom-made chamber and continuously perfused (2.5 ml/min) with oocyte recording solution containing (in millimolar concentrations) 90 NaCl, 1 KCl, 10 HEPES, 0.5 BaCl2, and 0.01 EDTA (pH 7.4 with NaOH). Solutions were applied by gravity, and solution exchange was controlled through a rotary valve (Hamilton, Reno, NV). Recording electrodes were filled with 0.3–3.0 M KCl, and current responses were recorded at a holding potential of −40 mV. Data acquisition, voltage, and solution exchange were controlled by custom software. Concentration-effect curves were expressed as a percentage of the response in the absence of test ligand and fitted by

where N is the Hill slope and maximum is the maximal response predicted for saturating concentration of potentiator.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A