In Expt 6 (Fig. S1), mice were decapitated and the brains dissected out, frozen on powdered dry ice, stored at −80 °C pre- and post-transport and transported on dry ice. Frozen brains were sectioned coronally at 20 μm and serial sections containing the VTA (bregma level −3.0 mm) or NAcc (bregma 1.8 mm) were collected and mounted on polysine coated slides, and stored at −80 °C prior to autoradiography; for each region, two sections were used per mouse and receptor. Autoradiography for D1 receptor binding was conducted according to (Dalton and Zavitsanou, 2011). Briefly, sections were preincubated in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) for 10 min, and then incubated for 1 h with 1 nM [3H]SCH-23390 (spec. act. 60 Ci/mmol, 1 mCi/ml, PerkinElmer, U.S.A.) in Tris-buffer at room temperature. Non-specific binding was assessed in the presence of 1 μM unlabelled R(+)-SCH-23390 (Sigma Aldrich, U.K.). Slides were rinsed 2x in ice-cold Tris buffer. The method used for D2 receptor autoradiography is described in (Leventopoulos et al., 2009). Briefly, sections were pre-incubated in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) for 20 min, and then incubated for 1.5 h with 2 nM [methoxy-3H]raclopride (spec. act. 85 Ci/mmol, 1 mCi/ml, American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc., U.S.A.) in Tris-buffer at room temperature. Non-specific binding was assessed using 1 μM unlabelled raclopride (Sigma Aldrich, U.K.). For D1 and D2 receptors, air-dried brain sections and 3H-microscale standards (Amersham Biosciences) were apposed to tritium-sensitive BioMax MR hyperfilm (Kodak, U.K.) for 6 weeks to generate autoradiograms, and tissue radioactivity was then quantified by densitometry using an image analysis system (MCID™, Version 7.0, Imaging Research Inc., Interfocus Ltd, Linton, U.K.). Flat-field correction and calibration of tritium standards were applied to quantify tissue radioactivity in nCi/mg. VTA and NAcc regions of interest were sampled in both the right and left hemispheres in each section and the mean value per mouse was used for statistical analysis; imperfect images with signs of tissue damage were excluded from the analysis.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.