Ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot assay

HF Helen A. Fletcher
MS Margaret A. Snowden
BL Bernard Landry
WR Wasima Rida
IS Iman Satti
SH Stephanie A. Harris
MM Magali Matsumiya
RT Rachel Tanner
MO Matthew K. O'Shea
VD Veerabadran Dheenadhayalan
LB Leah Bogardus
LS Lisa Stockdale
LM Leanne Marsay
AC Agnieszka Chomka
RH Rachel Harrington-Kandt
ZM Zita-Rose Manjaly-Thomas
VN Vivek Naranbhai
ES Elena Stylianou
FD Fatoumatta Darboe
AP Adam Penn-Nicholson
EN Elisa Nemes
MH Mark Hatherill
GH Gregory Hussey
HM Hassan Mahomed
MT Michele Tameris
JM J Bruce McClain
TE Thomas G. Evans
WH Willem A. Hanekom
TS Thomas J. Scriba
HM Helen McShane
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot assay was performed using a human IFN-γ ELISpot kit (capture mAb -D1K; Mabtech). Duplicate wells containing 3 × 105 PBMC were stimulated for 18 h with antigen, PHA as a positive control or media alone as a negative control. Antigens were: a single pool of Ag85A peptides, consisting of 66 15-mer peptides, overlapping by 10 amino acids (2 μg ml−1 per peptide; Peptide Protein Research); BCG from pooled SSI vaccine vials (2 × 105 colony-forming units (CFUs) per ml); PPD from M. tuberculosis (20 μg ml−1; Statens Serum Institute (SSI)); pools of peptides with knows CD8 T-cell epitopes from flu, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and CMV peptides (10 μg ml−1 per peptide; Peptide Protein Research); and combined TB10.3 and TB10.4 peptides (10 μg ml−1 per peptide; Peptide Protein Research). Results are reported as SFCs per million PBMCs, calculated by subtracting the mean of the unstimulated wells from the mean of antigen wells and correcting for the numbers of PBMC in the wells. A response was considered positive if the mean number of spots in the antigen well was at least twice the mean of the unstimulated wells and at least five spots greater.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A