Acyl-CoAs were extracted and analyzed using a modified version of a previously described method [34]. Briefly, gWAT was ground to a homogenous powder using a liquid nitrogen-chilled mortar and pestle. Approximately 30–40 mg (wet mass) of each pulverized tissue sample was rapidly transferred to a pre-weighed chilled Eppendorf tube before the addition of extraction solvent and the internal standard. For acyl-CoAs, 1 ml of extraction solvent was used; solvent was composed of 1:1 of 100 mM KH2PO4 and organic mixture (3:1:1 ACN, IPA: Methanol). The internal standard was 20 ng/ml of C17-CoA. The samples were sonicated on ice, followed by centrifugation at 4 °C. Clean extract was recovered and dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Dried sample was reconstituted with cold 1:1 (methanol: water) and 10 μl was injected on the LC-MS. Chromatographic separations were performed with an Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA) 1200 HPLC system equipped with a Waters (MA, USA) Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm) and a 2.1 × 5 mm VanGuard™ pre-column using the following conditions: mobile phase A was 10% acetonitrile, 90% MS water, mobile phase B was acetonitrile. Both mobile phases contained 15 mM ammonium hydroxide. The gradient program for LC-CoA started at 0% B which was held for 3 min while LC eluent was directed to the waste during this period. %B was ramped linearly to 30% B over 3 min, then ramped to 40% B over 6 more minutes, then held at 100% B for 4 min, after which the column was reconditioned using 100% A for 6 min. The total run time was 22 min and the flow rate was 0.25 ml/min. Metabolites were quantified by measuring the metabolite peak area as a ratio to its 13C internal standard analog and was normalized to the tissue weight.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.