Cell preparation and flow cytometric analysis for Th1/Th2/Treg/Th17 cells

YS Yang Shen
ZZ Zhi-Hai Zhang
DH Di Hu
XK Xia Ke
ZG Zheng Gu
QZ Qi-Yuan Zou
GH Guo-Hua Hu
SS Shang-Hua Song
HK Hou-Yong Kang
SH Su-Ling Hong
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Spleen tissues were collected, cut into small fragments, and teased apart to allow dispersion of the cells into RPMI 1640. The cells were passed through a 40 μm mesh to obtain a single cell suspension. Following a rinse, the cells were adjusted maximally to 2 × 106 cells/ml. For Th1, Th2 and Th17 detection, the cells were activated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, 50 ng/ml; Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) and ionomycin(1 μM; Sigma, USA) in the presence of monensin (1 μl/ml; BD, USA) for 4 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. For the analysis of Treg, cells were aliquoted into tubes for further staining.

We defined Th1 as CD3+CD4+IFN-γ+ cells, Th2 as CD3+CD4+IL-4+ cells, Treg as CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells, and Th17 cells as CD3+CD4+IL-17+ cells. The cells were incubated with PE-conjugated anti-rat CD3 and FITC-conjugated anti-rat CD4 for Th1, Th2, and Th17 analysis. The cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-rat CD4 and PE-conjugated anti-rat CD25 for Treg analysis. After surface staining, cells were re-suspended in a fixation and permeabilization solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions and then stained with Anti-rat IFN-gamma eFluor® 660/Anti-rat IL-4 eFluor® 660/Anti-rat Foxp3 APC/Anti-rat IL-17A APC. All of the antibodies were from eBioscience. Fluorescence profiles were analysed using a FACScan cytometer equipped with CellQuest software (BD). The results are expressed as a percentage of positive cells.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A