Voltage‐clamp recordings from lateral LHb neurons (from the posterior and middle segment, rather than from the rostral pole) were made at −50 mV with an internal medium consisting of (in mm): KCl 100, K‐gluconate 30, MgCl2 4, EGTA 0.2, HEPES 5, Na2ATP 3.4, Na3GTP 0.1, Na+ creatine phosphate 10; pH 7.3, 300 mOsm. As a result of the high chloride concentration in this medium, GABAAR responses are inward at −50 mV and easier to detect. After patching, LHb neurons were allowed to recover for at least 10 min before another epoch of 10 min of sIPSCs was recorded. Recordings were done in the presence of the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist NBQX (20 μm; Tocris) and the NMDA receptor antagonist D‐APV (100 μm; Tocris) to pharmacologically isolate GABAAR responses. These responses were mediated by GABAARs as they were blocked by the GABAAR antagonist (−)‐Bicuculline‐methiodide (20 μm; Tocris), as assessed in a subset of recordings.
mIPSCs were recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX; 1 μm; Tocris) to abolish action potential‐dependent transmission. Furthermore, to allow for better detection of mIPSCs, we voltage clamped cells at −50 mV with a cesium‐based internal solution, consisting of (in mm): CsCl 130, NaCl 4, MgCl2 2, EGTA 1.1, HEPES 5, Na2ATP 2, sodium creatinephosphate 5, Na3GTP 0.6, spermine 0.1; pH 7.3, 300 mOsm.
To record GABAAR transmission at EPN‐to‐LHb synapses, voltage‐clamp recordings were made at –50 mV using an internal medium consisting of (in mm): K‐Gluconate 140; KCl 5; HEPES 10; EGTA 0.2; MgCl2 2; Na2ATP 4; Na3GTP 0.3; creatine phosphate 10. Light pulses (470 nm, 1–10 ms) for opto‐stimulation of EPN nerve terminals were delivered with a LED (CoolLed, UK) illumination system. To isolate GABAAR responses we added the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist NBQX (20 μm; Tocris) and the NMDA receptor antagonist D‐APV (100 μm; Tocris) during the recording. To evoke GABABR responses we delivered a train of 10 pulses at 5, 10, or 20 Hz each sweep (0.1 Hz inter‐sweep interval). We utilized the same stimulation frequency for at least 10 consecutive sweeps and then averaged these sweeps. In this average trace, slow outward IPSCs were quantified as the delta current between the 50 ms baseline prior to opto‐stimulation and the current remaining between 40 and 50 ms after the tenth optogenetic pulse was delivered (when fast ionotropic GABAAR‐dependent responses had ended). A cell was classified as having a GABABR outward IPSC in the event that there was at least a 5 pA delta current quantified in this way that could be blocked by the GABABR antagonist CGP54626 (10 μm; Tocris UK). To detect the presence or absence of GABABR currents specifically in LHb neurons innervated by EPN (i.e. EPN‐responsive LHb neurons), we only used cells in which single pulse optogenetic stimulation of EPN nerve terminals gave rise to at least 50 pA of fast ionotropic synaptic current at −50 mV (AMPAR and/or GABAAR‐mediated). In the case of glutamine incubation experiments assessing effects on GABABR transmission, we preincubated the slice in ACSF with l‐Glutamine (2 mm; Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) for at least 20 min prior to the recording and then maintained this presence of glutamine throughout the recording.
For experiments in which GABABR‐responses were evoked pharmacologically we first ensured, by means of optogenetic stimulation of EPN terminals, that the recorded lateral LHb neuron was innervated by the EPN. Subsequently, in the absence of opto‐stimulation, we recorded the holding current required to maintain the cell at −50 mV during a baseline period (5 min). Then we applied the GABABR agonist (+)‐Baclofen (100 μm; Sigma‐Aldrich/Merck) for 5 min, and subsequently the GABABR antagonist CGP54626 (10 μm). The pharmacological GABABR response was quantified as the delta holding current between the baseline period and the peak current upon baclofen application.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.