In vitro tau aggregation

SM Sue-Ann Mok
CC Carlo Condello
RF Rebecca Freilich
AG Anne Gillies
TA Taylor Arhar
JO Javier Oroz
HK Harindranath Kadavath
OJ Olivier Julien
VA Victoria A. Assimon
JR Jennifer N. Rauch
BD Bryan M. Dunyak
JL Jungsoon Lee
FT Francis T.F. Tsai
MW Mark R. Wilson
MZ Markus Zweckstetter
CD Chad A. Dickey
JG Jason E. Gestwicki
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All proteins in assay were dialyzed overnight at 4 °C into assay buffer (Dulbecco’s PBS pH7.4, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT). Tau (10 μM) was pre-incubated in the presence or absence of chaperones (2.5 μM-20 μM) for 30 min at 37 °C. Thioflavin T (Sigma) at a final concentration of 10 μM was added and aggregation was induced by the addition of a freshly prepared heparin sodium salt solution (Santa Cruz) at a final concentration of 44 ug/ml. For non-induced controls, assay buffer was added in place of heparin solution. In assays using arachadonic acid as an aggregation inducer, heparin was replaced with arachadonic acid (150 μM) in 5% ethanol and non-induced controls contained 5% ethanol. Aggregation reactions were carried out at 37°C with continuous shaking and monitored via Thioflavin T fluorescence (excitation=444 nm, emission=485 nm, cutoff=480 nm) in a Spectramax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Readings were taken every 5 min for a minimum of 24 h. Note that for experiments with Hsp72SBD, assays were performed at 30°C, well below its observed protein melting point (42°C). Chaperones with poor solubility in standard screen conditions as indicated in the text were assayed in reactions with the following modifications: the tau concentration was reduced to 7.5 uM and the aggregation reaction was carried out in 96 well plates with total volumes of 200 ul per well.

For data processing, baseline curves of non-induced controls (3 replicates) were subtracted from induced samples (3 replicates). Baseline subtracted aggregation curves were analyzed in Grace plotting program (http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/) and fit to the Goempertz function 62,63:

where y= the fluorescence at time t, A is the amplitude of curve, ti is the inflection point, ti-b = lag time, and b = 1/kapp where kapp is the apparent elongation rate constant. Amplitude values are represented relative to 0N4R tauWT controls for each experiment to adjust for day to day fluctuations in absolute ThT signal intensity. Curves with final amplitude values <15% of the internal tau alone controls were classified as non-aggregating. For the primary aggregation screen, each experiment contained multiple reference controls including Hsc70 NBD and Hsc70 (at each concentrated tested) and 0N4R tauWT tau (10 μM). The effect of each chaperone on aggregation kinetics is normalized to the values for the internal Hsc70NBD and Hsc70 controls. Heat maps for chaperone effects on aggregation kinetics were generated in R 64. For experiments involving chaperone addition after lag phase period, the aggregation curve for 4 h immediately following addition was fit with linear regression to calculate the slope.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A