Statistical considerations

TN Torben K. Nielsen
MH Martin Højgaard
JA Jon T. Andersen
NJ Niklas Rye Jørgensen
BZ Bo Zerahn
BK Bent Kristensen
TH Trine Henriksen
JL Jens Lykkesfeldt
KM Kári J. Mikines
HP Henrik E. Poulsen
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Data were analyzed using R v.3.0.3. Data are presented as medians along with a Q1–Q3 interquartile range. Data collected at baseline and at week 12 were compared using a predefined paired non-parametric statistical test due to the study design and the small sample size. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The number of participants needed to achieve sufficient statistical power was calculated based on the primary efficacy marker using a slightly modified Ahern’s study design (14). The minimum response was determined based on TAX327-controls (15). p0 was estimated as 5%, p1 =30%, α =0.05 and power =80%. Further investigations were warranted if ≥3 of the 20 patients met the primary endpoint for efficacy.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A