IFN-γ ELISPOT assay.

DW Dai Wang
SP Shannon Phan
DD Daniel J. DiStefano
MC Michael P. Citron
CC Cheryl L. Callahan
LI Lani Indrawati
SD Sheri A. Dubey
GH Gwendolyn J. Heidecker
DG Dhanasekaran Govindarajan
XL Xiaoping Liang
BH Biao He
AE Amy S. Espeseth
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

PBMCs were isolated from whole blood by Ficoll gradient centrifugation and tested for IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to pools of synthetic peptides representing RSV proteins F, G, and N (15-mers overlapping by 11 amino acids). The F peptides were divided into two pools, F1 (amino acids [aa] 1 to 295) and F2 (aa 285 to 574). Ninety-six-well plates with polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore) were coated overnight at 4°C with anti-IFN-γ monoclonal antibody (U-Cytech). PBMCs were added to the blocked plates at 4 × 105/well. Peptide pools were added to the cells at approximately 2-μg/ml final concentration per peptide. After overnight incubation in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator, bound IFN-γ was detected with biotinylated anti-IFN-γ antibody (U-Cytech), followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (BD PharMingen) and NBT-BCIP (nitroblue tetrazolium–5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate) substrate (Pierce). Spots were enumerated using a digital imager and an automated counting system (AutoImmun Diagnostika [AID]), and responses were normalized to spot-forming cells (SFC) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. A positive response was defined as an antigen-specific response that was at least 55 spot-forming cells per 1 × 106 PBMCs and at least 3-fold over the corresponding unstimulated (mock) control.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A