Image analysis

DA Daniel J. Apicco
PA Peter E. A. Ash
BM Brandon Maziuk
CL Chelsey LeBlang
MM Maria Medalla
AA Ali Al Abdullatif
AF Antonio Ferragud
EB Emily Botelho
HB Heather I. Ballance
UD Uma Dhawan
SB Samantha Boudeau
AC Anna Lourdes Cruz
DK Daniel Kashy
AW Aria Wong
LG Lisa R. Goldberg
NY Neema Yazdani
CZ Cheng Zhang
CU Choong Y Ung
YT Yorghos Tripodis
NK Nicholas M. Kanaan
TI Tsuneya Ikezu
PC Pietro Cottone
JL John Leszyk
HL Hu Li
JL Jennifer Luebke
CB Camron D. Bryant
BW Benjamin Wolozin
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Images were analyzed for total fluorescence, co-localization, puncta, and cell numbers, as appropriate, using Imaris Bitplane and ImageJ image analysis software. For quantification of stress granules, PABP and TIA1 co-labeled sections were thresholded (TIA1 fluorescence intensity above 69.6, PABP intensity above 9.7) with nuclear masking using DAPI. The number of cytoplasmic (defined by exclusion from DAPI-positive nuclei) puncta with diameter greater than or equal to 2 μm co-positive for both TIA1 and PABP were counted and divided by the total number of DAPI-positive nuclei per image. For quantification of nuclear versus cytoplasmic immunofluorescence, images were processed as described above, and the total immunofluorescence of TIA1 within (nuclear) and outside (cytoplasmic) of DAPI-positive nuclei was calculated, and divided by the total number of DAPI-positive cells per image. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism data analysis software.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A