Stimuli Presentation and Data Acquisition

AM Anne K. Maxwell
RH Renee M. Banakis Hartl
NG Nathaniel T. Greene
VB Victor Benichoux
JM Jameson K. Mattingly
SC Stephen P. Cass
DT Daniel J. Tollin
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All experiments were performed in a double-walled sound-attenuating chamber (IAC Inc., Bronx, NY). Generation of sound stimuli and recording of responses was performed as described previously.24,2931 Briefly, stimuli were generated digitally, and presented via a bone conduction oscillator (Cochlear Ltd., Centennial, CO, U.S.A.) or a closed-field magnetic speaker (MF1; Tucker-Davis Technologies Inc., Alachua, FL) coupled directly to the ear with an ear speculum altered to accommodate flexible speaker tubing and to reduce sound escape. Both transducers were driven by an external sound card (Hammerfall Multiface II, RME, Haimhausen, Germany), and output directed to the loudspeaker was amplified with one channel of a stereo amplifier (TDT SA1). The sound intensity in the ear canal was measured with a probe-tube microphone (type 4182; Bruel & Kjær, Nærum, Denmark), which was also placed through the modified ear speculum. Baseline acoustic transfer functions were generated from presentation of short (1 second duration) tone pips between 100 and 14,000 Hz ramped on and off with one half (5 ms) of a Hanning window. Tones were presented at 70 to 120 dB SPL. Input from the microphone, LDV, and pressure sensors were simultaneously captured via the sound card analog inputs.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A