Binary classification metrics

KV K. Joeri van der Velde
EB Eddy N. de Boer
CD Cleo C. van Diemen
BS Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz
KA Kristin M. Abbott
AK Alain Knopperts
LF Lude Franke
RS Rolf H. Sijmons
TK Tom J. de Koning
CW Cisca Wijmenga
RS Richard J. Sinke
MS Morris A. Swertz
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Prediction tools may classify variants as benign or pathogenic, but may also fail to reach a classification or classify a variant as VUS. Because of these three outcome states, binary classification metrics must be used with caution. We define sensitivity as the number of detected pathogenic variants (true positives) over the total number of pathogenic variants, which includes true positives, false negatives (pathogenic variants misclassified as benign), and pathogenic variants that were otherwise “missed,” i.e. classified as VUS or not classified at all. Therefore, Sensitivity = TruePositive/(TruePositive + FalseNegative + MissedPositive). We applied the same definition for specificity and define it as: Specificity = TrueNegative/(TrueNegative + FalsePositive + MissedNegative). Following this line, accuracy is then defined as (TruePositive + TrueNegative)/(TruePositive + TrueNegative + FalsePositive + FalseNegative + MissedPositive + MissedNegative).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A