Protein preparation

GK Georg Krainer
PG Pablo Gracia
EF Erik Frotscher
AH Andreas Hartmann
PG Philip Gröger
SK Sandro Keller
MS Michael Schlierf
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

OmpLA was prepared and purified as described elsewhere (30, 31). Briefly, tag-free OmpLA without signal sequence was produced as inclusion bodies (IBs) in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. IBs were isolated, sonicated, and solubilized in 8 M urea. Unfolded OmpLA was separated from residual impurities by centrifugation for 30 min at 7000 × g and 4°C, refolded by drop dilution in buffer (20 mM Tris and 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.3)) containing 10 mM lauryldimethylamine N-oxide (LDAO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and folded protein was further isolated with anion exchange chromatography. For single-molecule fluorescence experiments a protein variant was engineered with two Cys residues at positions 125 and 234 (Fig. S1). After protein production and purification as described above under reducing conditions (5 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine), the protein was site-specifically labeled via thiol-maleimide chemistry with maleimide-functionalized donor (ATTO532; Atto-Tec, Siegen, Germany) and acceptor (ATTO647N; Atto-Tec) fluorophores. The labeled protein was separated from unbound dyes by size-exclusion chromatography. The melting point of labeled (Tm = (90.2 ± 0.2)°C) and unlabeled (Tm = (91.6 ± 0.6)°C) OmpLA agreed well in circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy measurements, indicating only little effect of the labels on the protein stability.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A