2.3. Sterol analysis through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS)

KW K.J. Whaley-Martin
BM B.J. Mailloux
AG A. van Geen
BB B.C. Bostick
KA K.M. Ahmed
IC I. Choudhury
GS G.F. Slater
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Sterol standards used for identification and quantification with GC–MS were cholestanol (5-α-cholestan-3β-ol, ≥95%, Sigma Aldrich), cholesterol (cholet-5-en-3β-ol, ~94%, Sigma Aldrich), stigmasterol (24-ethylcholesta-5,22E-dien-3β-ol, ~95%, Sigma Aldrich), campesterol (24-α-methyl-5-cholesten-3β-ol, ~65%, Sigma Aldrich), sitosterol (24-ethylcholest-5-en-3-β-ol, ≥97%, Sigma Aldrich) and coprostanol (5β-cholestan-3β-ol, ≥98%, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). All standards underwent the BSTFA derivatization at the same time as samples and their TMS-derivatives were used to compare to sample extracts (Table A1). Concentrated samples (run in 30 μL of BSTFA + 10 μL of pyridine) were run with 1 μL injections on an Agilent Technologies 6890N GC with an Agilent DB5-MS capillary column (30 m × 0.32 μm, 0.25 μm film thickness) coupled to a 5973 quadrupole mass spectrometer scanning for masses from 50 to 500 m/z. Operating GC–MS conditions included a temperature program with an initial hold for 1 min at 40 °C ramped to 300 °C at 4 °C/min and held at 300 °C for 24 min (Biache and Philp, 2013). The limit of quantification (0.5 μg/mL) was determined based on linearity of the sterol calibration curves. Final sterol LOQ’s for each particular sample (ng/g of sediment) was dependent on the total mass of sediment weight extracted (Table A2).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A