Each solution was presented 4 times per session on “adapt-test” trials that were spaced one minute apart to re-establish head-space vapor concentration (Rabin and Cain 1986). Figure 3 shows the 32 experimental “adapt-test” odor pairs and corresponding 32 control pairs. They each include the 4 single-components to assess identifiability of a component presented within a mixture series. Presentation of adapt-test pairs in the same random order occurred on separate days at least one day apart for experimental and control sessions. Orders of the 4 “extra sessions” and the 2 “experimental/control” sessions were randomized across subjects. Label choices after selective adaptation in experimental sessions were compared to choices made after water (the adapting stimulus) in control sessions.
Adapt-test stimulus presentations. (A) Experimental session adapt-test pairs are shown. Each stimulus is presented as an “extra” mixture component seven times, an “ambient” mixture component 12 times and a single component after water once, shaded blue. For example, Guaiacol is “extra” in the 7 mixtures shaded yellow and “ambient” in 12 mixtures shaded green. Binary-mixture rows are tagged on the left side by black rectangles. (B) Control session adapt-test pairs mirror experimental pairs except water (W) vapor was always the adapting stimulus. Subjects were tested once on each single compound, twice on each binary mixture, 3 times on each ternary mixture, and 4 times on the quaternary mixture. Binary-mixture rows are tagged on the right side by black rectangles.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.