We conducted genome-wide methylation analysis using EPIC and obtained β values indicating the methylation levels for 842 CpGs on 78 imprinted DMRs as previously reported [11]. We defined aberrantly methylated DMR based on previous reports [12, 39] (analysis method 1). In brief, the median β value for each CpG within a DMR was determined as the MML (median methylation level) of the DMR. An aberrantly methylated DMR was defined as |MML|> 3 SD obtained from the mean of MML in 16 healthy child controls. The aberrantly methylated DMRs were further classified as mild (ΔMML < 0.1), moderate (0.2 ≥ ΔMML ≥ 0.1), and extreme (ΔMML > 0.2) according to the difference between the MML of each patient and the mean of MML in the controls. In addition, we re-analyzed methylation-array data applying more stringent bioinformatic parameters using the Crawford-Howell t-test [47] and defined the aberrantly methylated DMRs. In brief, we considered a probe as differentially methylated, with an absolute value of ∆β (|∆β|) > 0.1 and a false discovery rate < 0.05. When we detected two or more consecutive probes differentially methylated levels within a DMR (including at least four probes), we defined the DMR as aberrantly methylated (analysis method 2).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.