Duodenoscope Investigation

ES Erica S. Shenoy
VP Virginia M. Pierce
MW Maroya Spalding Walters
HM Heather Moulton-Meissner
AL Adrian Lawsin
DL David Lonsway
AS Alicia Shugart
GM Gillian McAllister
AH Alison Laufer Halpin
AZ Alejandra Zambrano-Gonzalez
ER Erin E. Ryan
DS Dolores Suslak
AD Alexandra DeJesus
KB Kerri Barton
LM Lawrence C. Madoff
EM Eileen McHale
AD Alfred DeMaria
DH David C. Hooper
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Duodenoscope reprocessing at MGH was conducted using the manufacturer’s updated instructions for use [26] and also included: a second HLD step in the automatic endoscope reprocessor (Medivators, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota), testing for residual bioburden after manual cleaning and before first HLD (Channel Check, Healthmark, Fraser, Michigan), and periodic culturing and sequestering of duodenoscopes. The duodenoscope used for ERCP in C1 and E4/C2 was a closed-elevator wire channel duodenoscope in service since October 2014 and leased from the manufacturer. It was sequestered on day 16; surveillance samples to assess for bacterial contamination were collected by MGH staff following CDC guidance [27] and sent to a third-party laboratory for culture-based analysis (Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Denver, Colorado). Additional sampling was performed at the CDC 86 days after last use of the duodenoscope [27, 28]. The duodenoscope was then returned to the manufacturer (PENTAX Medical, Montvale, New Jersey) for evaluation for mechanical defects.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A