RNA-Seq and differential analysis

AD Alexander Duncan
MH Mary P. Heyer
MI Masago Ishikawa
SC Stephanie P. B. Caligiuri
XL Xin-an Liu
ZC Zuxin Chen
MB Maria Vittoria di Bonaventura
KE Karim Elayouby
JA Jessica L. Ables
WH William M. Howe
PB Purva Bali
CF Clementine Fillinger
MW Maya Williams
RO Richard O’Connor
ZW Zichen Wang
QL Qun Lu
TK Theodore M. Kamenecka
AM Avi Ma’ayan
HO Heidi C. O’Neill
II Ines Ibanez-Tallon
AG Aron M. Geurts
PK Paul J. Kenny
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

RNA-Seq data generated from Illumina HiSeq 2500 were processed following an open source pipeline 42. A total of n=9 rats of each genotype (Tcf7l2WT and Tcf7l2mut) were used. RNA libraries for each brain region were generated from pooled RNA from three animals per group. Briefly, the paired-end sequencing reads were aligned to the human genome (version hg19) and rat genome (version rn6), using the Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a (STAR) 43. Next, featureCount 44 was employed to assign aligned reads to genes. Count per Million (CPM) was used as the expression quantification method. The CPM matrix was log2 transformed and Z-score scaled to center the expression values of each gene to 0 with a standard deviation of 1 before performing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchical Clustering (HC). The Characteristic Direction 45 was used to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes between the Tcf7l2mut and Tcf7l2WT samples. Enrichment analyses for DE genes were performed using Enrichr 46,47. RNA-Seq data generated from TRAP were processed and analyzed as previously described 16,17.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A