2.12. Calcium imaging of mammalian sensory neurons

SN Samantha A. Nixon
SR Samuel D. Robinson
AA Akello J. Agwa
AW Andrew A. Walker
SC Shivani Choudhary
AT Axel Touchard
EU Eivind A.B. Undheim
AR Alan Robertson
IV Irina Vetter
CS Christina I. Schroeder
AK Andrew C. Kotze
VH Volker Herzig
GK Glenn F. King
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Calcium imaging of mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sensory cells was performed as previously described [24]. In brief, DRG cells isolated from 4 to 8-week-old male CS7BL/6 mice (under The University of Queensland Animal Ethics Committee approval TRI/IMB/093/17) were dissociated and plated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% FBS (Assaymatrix, Melbourne, Australia) and penicillin/streptomycin (ThermoFisher) on a 96-well poly-D-lysine--coated culture plate (Corning), and maintained overnight. Cells were loaded with Fluo-4 AM calcium indicator as per the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher). After loading for 1 h, the dye solution was replaced with assay solution (Hanks’ balanced salt solution and 20 mM HEPES). Fluorescence corresponding to intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) of typically 100–150 DRG cells per experiment was monitored in parallel using a Nikon Ti-E deconvolution inverted microscope, equipped with a Lumencor Spectra LED light source. Images were acquired using a 20 × objective at one frame/s (excitation 485 nm; emission 521 nm). For each experiment, baseline fluorescence was monitored for 30 s and then a wash of assay solution was applied. At 60 s, the assay solution was replaced with assay solution containing individual peptides (10 μM) and the cells were observed for a further 90 s.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A