Quality assessment of the studies was performed by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) checklist for cross-sectional studies [16]. This checklist consisted of the parts' selection (in turn, including representativeness of the sample 0-1 point, sample size 0-1 point, nonrespondents 0-1 point, and ascertainment of the exposure 0–2 points), comparability 0 and 2 points, and outcome (in turn, including assessment of outcome 0–2 points and statistical tests 0-1 point). The total scoring categories were unsatisfactory (<5 points), satisfactory (5-6 points), good (7-8 points), and very good (8–10 points). The process was conducted by two independent researchers.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.