2.3.2. Quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) of the aroma

JO Jian Ouyang
RJ Ronggang Jiang
HX Hao Xu
SW Shuai Wen
CL Changwei Liu
YL Yang Liu
HC Hongyu Chen
YZ Yuke Zhai
HX He Xie
JC Jinhua Chen
SL Shi Li
KW Kunbo Wang
ZL Zhonghua Liu
JH Jian-an Huang
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Based on the traditional sensory evaluation, we evaluated the aroma profiles of the three grades of HPBT. All assessors have previously undergone specific training to identify, describe and quantify different aroma characteristics. Subsequently, we selected six aroma quality descriptors that best represented the common aroma qualities, including fruity, floral, sweet, roasted, fresh, and pekoe. Finally, a 5-point rating scale(0 denoted non-existent, 3 represented medium intensity, and 5 signified very strong) was employed to evaluate the aroma attributes of each sample according to our previous research (Chen et al., 2023; Ouyang et al., 2024). The sensory attribute intensity was based on the average ratings given by the seven panelists.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A