2.3.4. Segregation analysis in European replication cohort

NI Nina Ishorst
LH Leonie Henschel
FT Frederic Thieme
DD Dmitriy Drichel
SS Sugirthan Sivalingam
SM Sarah L. Mehrem
AF Ariane C. Fechtner
JF Julia Fazaal
JW Julia Welzenbach
AH André Heimbach
CM Carlo Maj
OB Oleg Borisov
JH Jonas Hausen
RR Ruth Raff
AH Alexander Hoischen
MD Michael Dixon
AR Alvaro Rada‐Iglesias
MB Michaela Bartusel
AR Augusto Rojas‐Martinez
KA Khalid Aldhorae
BB Bert Braumann
TK Teresa Kruse
CK Christian Kirschneck
GS Gerrit Spanier
HR Heiko Reutter
SN Stefanie Nowak
LG Lina Gölz
MK Michael Knapp
AB Andreas Buness
PK Peter Krawitz
MN Markus M. Nöthen
MN Michael Nothnagel
TB Tim Becker
KL Kerstin U. Ludwig
EM Elisabeth Mangold
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Filtering was performed for missense and nonsense variants that fulfilled all three of the following criteria: (i) a CADD score ≥15 (Rentzsch et al., 2019); (ii) an MAF ≤0.1% in the GnomAD non‐Finnish European exomes; and (iii) a presence in nsCL/P patients only in the present cohorts (Figure 3b). To determine whether the detected variants encompassed further DNVs, Sanger sequencing was performed in unaffected parents for whom DNA was available. For families with more than one affected family member, co‐segregation analysis using Sanger sequencing was performed when DNA was available. Primer sequences are available upon request. For index patients carrying a DNV, paternity testing was performed using the Powerplex 16 HS System (Promega).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A