5) Model regularization:

ZX Zhaoyan Xiu
MM Mark Muzi
JH Jian Huang
EW Eric Wolsztynski
ask Ask a question
Favorite

In cases of low signal-to-noise ratio1, regularization of the patient-specific mixing weights π can be applied to control variability of these estimates. Once the number and parameters of the population components have been determined, a penalized nonlinear least squares approach using the historical linear parameters as a Bayesian penalty for individual fit [34] is used for this approach. Regularization on π = πk parameters for the kth patient is achieved using the following individual objective function:

where z={zik}i=1mk, AΔ = [Aijk]i,j is a matrix of dimension mk × J, and W = Wk are defined in Section II-B.1. All components in the vectorized mixing weights π are constrained to be nonnegative, and π0 and Ω respectively denote the mean and covariance matrix of linear parameters obtained from population-based estimation. regularization parameter λ controls the trade-off between individual and population data contributions, larger values of λ constraining individual estimates to be closer to the population profile π0, which suits higher-noise scenarios. The optimization is a quadratic problem for which we used the Goldfarb-Idnami method [33].

Parameter λ is set by minimizing the generalized cross-validation (GCV) score which is defined as the mean squared error adjusted by the effective degree of freedom:

where z^ik(λ) is C^P(tikΔk,πk,θ) based on minimization of the objective function defined in Eqn. (2), for a given λ.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A