2.6. Statistical Analysis

LC Luca Crisanti
GV Gabriele Valli
EC Elisa Cennamo
AC Alessandro Capolino
PF Paolo Fratini
CC Claudio Cesaro
GA Gloria Adducchio
AM Antonio De Magistris
FT Ferdinando Terlizzi
MR Maria Pia Ruggieri
EM Enrico Mirante
CS Claudio Savoriti
KS Kalyarat Sukruang
VV Valentina Valeriano
FP Francesco Rocco Pugliese
FT Francesco Travaglino
SS Salvatore Di Somma
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The whole statistical examination has been performed using the statistical software StatPlus (StatPlus Pro v7©, AlaystSoft Inc., Walnut, CA, USA). Categorical variables were summarized in crosstab and expressed as % of the own group and analyzed using a χ2 test, and if the test gave a significant result, that was further analyzed with a z-test. Continuous variables were shown as median and interquartile range (IQR). The differences between medians were tested using the test U of Mann–Whitney. The Box-Plot graph was realized for the main results to visualize the values of distribution.

A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

For the statistical analysis, we grouped together patients with an HFpEF (LVEF > 50%) and HFmrEF (LVEF between 41–49%), because we did not find any significant difference between the main variables (outcome; p-value 0.5, and hs-cTnI values; p-value 0.4). Furthermore, given the setting of ED, an ejection fraction of less than 40% was chosen as able to identify a compromised ventricular function, assuming that this value is less susceptible to variability between operators.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A