Equipment

RF R. Benjamin Free
AN Ashley N. Nilson
NB Noelia M. Boldizsar
TD Trevor B. Doyle
RR Ramona M. Rodriguiz
VP Vladimir M. Pogorelov
MM Mayako Machino
& &
KL Kuo Hao Lee
JB Jeremiah W. Bertz
JX Jinbin Xu
HL Herman D. Lim
AD Andrés E. Dulcey
RM Robert H. Mach
JW James H. Woods
JL J Robert Lane
LS Lei Shi
JM Juan J. Marugan
WW William C. Wetsel
DS David R. Sibley
* *
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For the rat studies, experiments were conducted in transparent plastic observation chambers (48 × 23 × 20 cm), which resembled the animals’ home cages, except there was no food, water, or bedding in the observation chambers. For the observation of yawning, angled mirrors were placed behind the chambers to facilitate viewing the rat regardless of its position in the chamber. For the mouse experiments, motor activity was assessed in a 21 × 21 × 30 cm3 open field (Omnitech Inc., Columbus, OH), and PPI was tested in San Diego Instruments apparatus (San Diego, CA) as described previously.63 Catalepsy was evaluated in two separate formats; it was assessed with the horizontal bar (6 mm wooden pole, 30 cm long, and 3 cm high) as described,63 and with the 45° inclined screen [the black polyester PetScreen was 16 mesh, 45 × 50 cm in size, and bordered with an aluminum frame (Phifer Inc., Tuscaloosa, Alabama)] assay as outlined elsewhere.64

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A