DNA Sequencing and Variant Annotation

MT Matthew R. Trendowski
CS Christopher Sample
TB Tara Baird
AS Azita Sadeghpour
DM David Moon
JR Julie J. Ruterbusch
JB Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer
KC Kathleen A. Cooney
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Extracted genomic DNA was prepared for whole-exome sequencing, and sequencing was performed at the Sequencing and Genomic Technologies Shared Resource, part of the Duke University School of Medicine (Durham, NC). A custom pipeline on the basis of GATK best practices was used for variant calling.16 All pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants were confirmed using Sanger sequencing. Filtered variants and multiple-nucleotide variants (Data Supplement) were individually assessed for classification into three categories: (1) benign or likely benign (B/LB), (2) variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (3) pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP). VarSome (releases 9-10)17 was used to establish base American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) classification criteria,18 which were then adjusted to align with Sequence Variant Interpretation-Working Group (SVI-WG) recommendations.19 Three researchers (A.S., C.S., and D.M.) reviewed all variants independently and, if needed, formed a consensus for conflicting classifications. Further details on sample inclusion, sequencing technology, and data processing are provided in the Data Supplement.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A