Applying an adapted version of risk of bias tool which was the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT), three review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies (Ruszymah et al., 2020). This analysis tool entails the risk of bias in several domains: 1) selection bias; 2) performance bias; 3) detection bias; 4) attrition bias; 5) reporting bias. Studies were deemed as exhibiting a low risk of bias (+), high risk of bias (−), unclear risk of bias (?) or not applicable (NA) (Supplementary Table S1). Consensus was achieved via discussion between the review authors for any variance in the risk of bias analysis.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.