2.15. Molecular Docking

AG Alina González-Ortiz
AP Angel Pulido-Capiz
CC César Y. Castañeda-Sánchez
EI Esmeralda Ibarra-López
OG Octavio Galindo-Hernández
MC Maritza Anahí Calderón-Fernández
LL Leslie Y. López-Cossio
RD Raul Díaz-Molina
BC Brenda Chimal-Vega
NS Nicolás Serafín-Higuera
IC Iván Córdova-Guerrero
VG Victor García-González
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

eIF4A1 three-dimensional structure was obtained from the Protein Data Bank ID 5ZC9, which corresponds to the structure of human eIF4A1-ATP with a resolution of 2Å [42]. The structures of ligand molecules were obtained from the PubChem database [43], Cry (CID 160254) and rocaglamide (CID 331783). The protein structure was prepared by removing water and small molecules, leaving only the protein structure. Ligand and receptor were 3D-protonated, and energy minimization was performed using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software with default parameters under the AMBER89 force field. For the ligand, it generates different conformations by the use of a stochastic search in MOE default parameters.

The active site was predicted by employing the site finder option of the MOE software [44]. Molecular docking was set at default parameters for MOE software, and the pre-conformations were employed. For the interpretation of docking results, MOE identifies salt bridges, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, sulfur-LP, cation-π, and solvent exposure and gives the S score. Ligand interactions with target proteins were predicted on the basis of the S score [45].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A