Narrative synthesis of findings

RM Rosemary R. C. McEachan
RR Rukhsana Rashid
GS Gillian Santorelli
JT James Tate
JT Jamie Thorpe
JM James B. McQuaid
JW John Wright
KP Kate E. Pickett
KP Kirsty Pringle
LB Laura Bojke
SJ Sally Jones
SI Shahid Islam
SW Simon Walker
TY Tiffany C. Yang
MB Maria Bryant
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Evaluation of complex interventions such as the B-CAP requires a comprehensive strategy. Our conceptual model (Fig. ​(Fig.2)2) recognises the links and interactions between all work-packages. For example, in order to understand the impact of the B-CAP on health inequalities we will combine insights from qualitative research (WP1A), survey (WP1B), air quality assessment (WP2), health outcomes (WP3) and our health economic analysis (WP4). In order to explore bidirectional influences of context and setting we will consider our findings in light of policy changes, new information (for example, national trends in air quality, vehicle ownership) and information from the DEFRA national evaluation over the duration of the study. We will synthesise findings from each work-package to develop a broader and comprehensive analysis which will help us to develop recommendations to inform policy.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A