Tumor fraction correlations at TFBSs

AD Anna-Lisa Doebley
MK Minjeong Ko
HL Hanna Liao
AC A. Eden Cruikshank
KS Katheryn Santos
CK Caroline Kikawa
JH Joseph B. Hiatt
RP Robert D. Patton
NS Navonil De Sarkar
KC Katharine A. Collier
AH Anna C. H. Hoge
KC Katharine Chen
AZ Anat Zimmer
ZW Zachary T. Weber
MA Mohamed Adil
JR Jonathan B. Reichel
PP Paz Polak
VA Viktor A. Adalsteinsson
PN Peter S. Nelson
DM David MacPherson
HP Heather A. Parsons
DS Daniel G. Stover
GH Gavin Ha
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For 191 MBC ULP samples with >0.1 tumor fraction, nucleosome profiling with and without GC correction was performed on the top 10,000 sites for each of 377 transcription factors (TFs) using nucleosome sized fragments (100–200 bp). For each TF, the relationship between central coverage and tumor fraction was modeled using scipy.stats.linregress84 producing a Pearson correlation (r) and line of best fit (scipy version 1.7.1). Pearson p-values for each feature type were adjusted using a Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction. Root mean squared error (RMSE) was calculated from the line of best fit. This was performed both before and after GC correction as illustrated for LYL1 in Fig. 2e. For all 377 TFs, the RMSE values before and after GC correction were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-sided). This same procedure was applied to test the benefit of an additional mappability correction step and an additional copy number correction step.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A