3D variability analysis and non-uniform refinement in Cryosparc

SP Sarah J. Piper
GD Giuseppe Deganutti
JL Jessica Lu
PZ Peishen Zhao
YL Yi-Lynn Liang
YL Yao Lu
MF Madeleine M. Fletcher
MH Mohammed Akhter Hossain
AC Arthur Christopoulos
CR Christopher A. Reynolds
RD Radostin Danev
PS Patrick M. Sexton
DW Denise Wootten
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For the data refinement and analysis in Cryosparc, the Relion particle stacks from the global consensus refinement as well as the consensus refinement map (as reference volume) were imported into the cryosparc v2 pipeline63. A consensus refinement in Cryosparc using the Homogeneous refinement tool was produced, which was used as an input for the 3D variability analysis64. For the variability analysis, the wide mask created automatically during refinement in Cryosparc (including micelle) was applied. The frames of the 3 principal components generated in the 3D variability analysis were visualized using the ChimeraX volume series tool and shown in the recorded movies. Backbone models of the Cryosparc 3D variability frames were modelled into the extreme frames (#0 and #19) of each component using Isolde, based on the final consensus model. The Cryosparc non-uniform refinement tool65 was used as alternative refinement method, to test resolvability of lower resolution areas, using default parameters and particle stacks imported from the Relion consensus refinement. The output maps were used to validate the Relion-derived maps and models and deposited as additional maps.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A