Improve Research Reproducibility A Bio-protocol resource
- Home
- Protocols
-
Ask a
question
Favorite
Two reviewers (CB, SA) carried out study selection independently and in duplicate in the following stages:
Disagreements between reviewers in any stage were resolved by consensus-based discussion. Reviewers were blinded neither to author names and study sites, nor to the results of the included RCTs. A record of the study selection procedure was kept.
Copyright and License information: The Author(s) ©2022
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Post a Question0 Q&A
