Clinical sample selection

JC Jessica Comín
AC Alberto Cebollada
DI Daniel Ibarz
JV Jesús Viñuelas
JS Juan Sahagún
LT Luis Torres
MI María-José Iglesias
SS Sofía Samper
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All IS6110-RFLP and Spoligo patterns of the M. tuberculosis isolates from 2004 to 2020 were loaded in the Bionumerics database (v7.6, Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Among the 2553 genotyped isolates, we selected two or three isolates belonging to each of the IS6110-clusters involving 10 or more cases of TB: CLS 2 (one isolate from 2007 and one from 2016), CLS 5 (2007/2016), CLS 7 (2004/2019), CLS 8 (2004/2012), CLS 9 (2004/2016), CLS 13 (2004/2015), CLS 14 (2005/2013/2020), CLS 15 (2005/2008), CLS 19 (2005/2011), CLS 21 (2007/2018), CLS 24 (2005/2018), CLS 26 (2004/2018), CLS 28 (2005/2016), CLS 30 (2008/2015), CLS 47 (2004/2011/2019), CLS 49 (2006/2012/2015), CLS 50 (2005/2018), CLS 67 (2007/2013/2016), CLS 71 (2007/2020), CLS 91 (2005/2010), CLS 93 (2008/2019), CLS 119 (2012/2018), CLS 152 (2014/2020), CLS 157 (2011/2019), CLS 195 (2013/2017) and CLS 217 (2015/2017). Three of these clusters were independently studied by WGS: CLS 77 (57 isolates sequenced), CLS 509 (32 isolates sequenced), and CLS 2178 (13 isolates sequenced).

Thirteen genomes from different sub-lineages, six from L4.1.2 and seven from L4.3, not involved in any of the large outbreaks (non-clustered strains) and sequenced in previous studies, were used to make the comparisons with the clustered strains belonging to these sub-lineages.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A