The Hodgkin–Huxley model (HH model) assumes that the channel gates are independent; however, experiments have shown that activation and inactivation processes are typically dependent on each other. As a result, explicit representations of ion channel states are necessary, as in the case of Markov chain models. Jæger et al. mentioned that the Markov model is able to give a more realistic representation of both the effect of mutations and the effect of drugs46, and the superiority of the Markov model was also explicitly demonstrated in other simulation studies47. Therefore, the Markov chain model of IKr developed in this study is more accurate than the HH-based IKr formulations. A general introduction to the use of Markov models can be found in ref. 48.
The Markov chain model for IKr in this study was based on a previous IKr model by Clancy and Rudy49, as illustrated in Fig. Fig.1B.1B. The model contained five states, including an open state (O), an inactivated state (I), and three closed states (C1, C2, C3). The model parameters were optimized by minimizing the least-squared difference between the model-generated current–voltage (I–V) curve and the experimentally recorded I–V data. The optimizing process was performed using the LMFIT package that implemented in Python. Model equations and the fitted transition rates are listed in Eqs. (1)–(25).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.