RNFL thickness

FH Frank C. T. van der Heide
YF Yuri D. Foreman
IF Iris W. M. Franken
RH Ronald M. A. Henry
AK Abraham A. Kroon
PD Pieter C. Dagnelie
SE Simone J. P. M. Eussen
TB Tos T. J. M. Berendschot
JS Jan S. A. G. Schouten
CW Carroll A. B. Webers
MS Miranda T. Schram
CK Carla J. H. van der Kallen
MG Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek
AW Anke Wesselius
CS Casper G. Schalkwijk
NS Nicolaas C. Schaper
MB Martijn C. G. J. Brouwers
CS Coen D. A. Stehouwer
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We assessed peripapillary RNFL thickness (μm) in both eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Spectralis unit and Eye Explorer version 5.7.5.0 software; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany; 3.45-mm-diameter circle scan, manually centred on optic nerve head, 12°, 768 voxels, 100 automatic real-time tracking). Intra- and interindividual reliability, expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients, are 0.97 and 0.96 respectively31. At least 15 min before the examination, pupils were dilated with topical 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine. Experienced graders masked to clinical information on the participants reviewed the OCT scans and graded their quality. OCT images were excluded if one of the following criteria was present: scan error (i.e., incomplete scan, poor centring of the circular scan on the optic nerve head, RNFL layer incorrectly defined, or technical problem with the OCT device) or poor imaging quality (signal-to-noise ratio < 15 dB)23. If data from both eyes were available (n = 2796 participants) we averaged RNFL thickness in order to reduce measurement error. If data from only one eye were available (n = 2755 participants), we used the RNFL thickness of that eye in the analyses. More details, including on quality criteria, are shown in the Supplemental Methods.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A