Some of the fundamental biochemical properties of the selected proteins were predicted using different web servers. For antigenicity, VaxiJen v2.0 (threshold: 0.45) possesses 78.0% prediction accuracy, based on physicochemical features of a protein (http://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/vaxijen/VaxiJen/VaxiJen.html) [32]. Also, ANTIGENpro, available at http://scratch.proteomics.ics.uci.edu/, is an alignment- and pathogen-free predictor of antigenicity using microarray data. Another important aspect of a vaccine candidate is lack of allergenicity, which was predicted using two web servers [33]. AllergenFP v1.0, available at https://ddg-pharmfac.net/AllergenFP/method.html, differentiates allergens from nonallergens with a descriptor fingerprint approach [34], whereas AllerTOP v2.0, available at https://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/AllerTOP/method.html, performs mostly through k-nearest neighbors (k NN) [35]. The solubility of each protein was predicted using Protein-Sol server (https://protein-sol.manchester.ac.uk/), based on available data for Escherichia coli protein solubility in a cell-free expression system [36].
Preliminary physicochemical properties of the erythrocytic stage proteins were predicted using ProtParam server, available at https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, which estimates the molecular weight (MW), positively and negatively charged residues, isoelectric point (pI), in vitro and in vivo estimated half-life, instability index, aliphatic index, and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) [37]. Moreover, three online bioinformatics tools from DTU Health Tech Services server (Denmark), available at https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/, including SignalP-6.0 [38], Deep TMHMM [39], and DeepLoc-2.0 [40] were used to characterize the putative signal peptide, transmembrane domain, and subcellular localization for each protein.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.