Study design

JM James H. McMahon
JL Jillian S.Y. Lau
AC Anna Coldham
JR Janine Roney
MH Michelle Hagenauer
SP Sally Price
MB Mellissa Bryant
JG Jill Garlick
AP Anne Paterson
SL Sue J. Lee
JO Jess O'Bryan
AH Anna Hearps
GT Gilda Tachedjian
HP Henry Pinskier
CP Cameron Phillips
SG Stuart Garrow
NP Nathan Pinskier
RM Robert Melvin
LB Luke Blakeway
JW Jessica A. Wisniewski
SB Sally Byers
GB Gnei Z. Badoordeen
SP Stephanie Pereira
KP Katherine Pragastis
JT Jason A. Trubiano
KC Kyra Y.L. Chua
MK Marion Kainer
JM James S. Molton
BG Bradley J. Gardiner
AP Anna B. Pierce
AC Allen Cheng
BR Benjamin A. Rogers
AP Anton Y. Peleg
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We performed a randomised placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of favipiravir versus matched placebo (NCT04445467) in individuals infected with COVID-19.11 The study was approved by the Alfred Ethics Committee (No 406/20) and all participants provided informed consent. The trial was overseen by an independent safety monitoring committee (SMC). Eligible participants with confirmed COVID-19 were randomised 1:1 to favipiravir or placebo for 14 days in addition to standard of care. Participants were recruited from July 2020 to September 2021 and were followed for a minimum of 28 days. Participants could be either in the community or a hospital inpatient at time of recruitment.

The sample size calculation was based on estimates from two studies available prior to the trial commencing.9,10 One randomised trial of 236 patients reported 61% of people receiving favipiravir compared to 52% of people receiving umifenovir met the primary clinical recovery endpoint by day 7.10 In a non-randomised study of 80 people (subsequently retracted), 90% of the favipiravir group achieved viral clearance compared to 57% of those on lopinavir/ritonavir, with a significantly faster rate of clearance in patients who received favipiravir (Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.43, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.1).9 We assumed 80% of patients on favipiravir and 60% of patients in the placebo arm would reach virological cure with twice as fast a rate of cure occurring in the favipiravir arm (HR 2.0). Assuming an alpha of 0.05, 86 participants in each arm would allow a log rank comparison with 80% power. Allowing for 10% lost to follow-up, we aimed to recruit 190 participants.

Favipiravir dosing was based on a 50% effective concentration or EC50 of 61.88 μM (9.7 μg/ml) in vitro8 and the knowledge that mean daily trough levels over 20 μg/ml are achieved with the same dosing proposed in this trial.12 Participants were given 1800 mg of favipiravir twice daily on Day 1 followed by 800 mg twice daily or identical placebo tablets. Duration of dosing was 14 days based on reports from available published trials at study initiation.9,10

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A