4.2.2. DFT and Time-Dependent DFT Calculations

VS Vladyslav Savchenko
NL Nino Lomadze
SS Svetlana Santer
OG Olga Guskova
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All DFT calculations are carried out with Gaussian 09 Revision C.01 suite [74]. The geometry optimization of SP and MC is performed in a gas phase using the B3LYP/DGDZVP basis set with a tight self-consistent field convergence threshold. This functional is widely and successfully employed in studies of spiropyran-containing molecules [10,11,49,57,58,59,60]. Next, the ground state geometries are optimized by applying the integral equation formalism variant of the polarizable continuum model to simulate the solvent environment [72]. In this model, the molecular cavity is constructed applying the Universal Force Field [73]; the shape of the cavity is defined by interlocking spheres centered on each solute atom having van der Waals radii scaled by a factor 1.1. Harmonic vibrational frequency calculations are used to confirm that the structure of each isomer in vacuum and in IEFPCM/UFF solvent is a true minimum, to obtain the standard enthalpy of formation and to calculate the zero-point energy correction at 298 K. The solvents mimicked in the DFT calculations are: chloroform (ϵ = 4.7113 ), ethanol (ϵ = 24.852), acetonitrile (ϵ = 35.688), dimethyl sulfoxide (ϵ = 46.826), and water (ϵ = 78.3553).

The vertical transition energies to the first 100 excited states are calculated for each isomer having optimized geometries in a particular solvent using time-dependent DFT with the B3LYP [58], PBE [87] functionals and the DGDZVP and 6-311G* basis set, correspondingly. The DGDZVP basis set is shown to predict the energies close with respect to the experiment transition energies, e.g., for merocyanines [88]. The combination B3LYP/6-311G* has also shown a good agreement with measured spectra [75]. The electronic spectra are simulated employing Gaussian functions with the half-width at half height of 0.333 eV to build a continuous spectrum from a collection of transition peaks corresponding to the time-dependent DFT transition energies and oscillator strengths. For the qualitative description of the electronic transitions, the natural transition orbitals [98] for the excited state of interest are analyzed.

The solvent-accessible surface area of the TMAB head (a) and the occupied molecular volumes (v) are calculated for the optimized geometries in implicit water [96]. The rolling probe radius is 1.4 Å for water [99]. These quantities, as well as the length of the hydrophobic tail (l) of the amphiphile are further used for the calculation of the Israelachvili’s critical packing parameter P [94], as described in our previous publications [3,100]. The p value predicts possible micellar structures that could be built by a surfactant in water (Equation (2)):

The electrostatic potential V(r) is calculated using the Merz-Singh-Kollman procedure [101] for the molecular cations and for the cations paired with bromine anion and mapped onto a surface with an electron density isovalue of 0.02 au. The ESP (Equation (3)) is defined as the interaction energy between the electrical charge generated from the molecule electrons and a positive point charge as a probe located at the position r:

Here zA is the charge of the nucleus A, which is a point charge located at RA. The term ρ(r) is the electron density function. The sign of the electrostatic potential is correlated to the partial charges on the atoms/atomic groups, i.e., the value at the minimum of V(r) quantifies the electron-rich character of that region, and vice versa. The initial guess for the Br anion placement next to the molecular cation is made using the analysis of the partial ESP charges.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A